On Israel's separation
fence (part 2)
Meron Rappaport, Yedioth Ahronoth,
31 May 2003
(Translated by Israel
News Today) 
Above:
Israeli construction workers lower another section of the wall into
place near Qalqiliya. (Ronald
de Hommel)
At the end of September, so the Internet site of Matan
proudly relates, the director general of the Defense Ministry Amos
Yaron and Haim Ramon, then the chairman of the Foreign Affairs and
Defense Committee visited the site and said, "It would be a
mistake to have territorial contiguity between Kalkilya and Habla."
On September 25, Amikam Svirski, the defense minister's adviser on
settler affairs, sent them a letter with the good news. Your position
has been accepted. "We've gone very far from the original plan,"
Hasdai boasts, "We've moved the Green Line."
Changing
the route cost Israel a lot of money. NIS 130 million, Hasdai
estimates. The Settlers Council, he relates, were a bit envious of
him, they said he'd only succeeded because he was a member of the
Likud Central Committee and Sharon needed him in the primaries.
Hasdai dismisses this. "It wasn't because I'm a Central
Committee member that NIS 130 million was spent on the fence in Alfei
Menashe," he says. "I won because I stressed that we are
situated on the first mountain chain after the coastal plain, and we
could serve as a security barrier."
Alfei Menashe and
Matan's success was a catastrophe for Kalkilya. The city became an
island surrounded by fences on four sides, cut off from the villagers
that bring it goods and do their shopping and depend on it for civil
services. But, as Uzi Dayan says, "The fence isn't supposed to
make everybody happy. There was no choice."
On paper, the
planners looked out for the Palestinians' rights. Mashiah relates
that the farmers whose land was taken for the fence were given seven
days to submit their reservations, and in some cases, were given a
further extension so they could petition the High Court of Justice.
In practice, there was little consideration of the Palestinians.
Mashiah relates that in only one place, near Umm el-Fahm, were the
Palestinians' reservations on the fence's route accepted.
So
in what way were the fence builders considerate? The ancient Egyptian
city discovered near the Taibe roadblock delayed work there by two
months. In order not to harm the Gilboa irises, it was decided that
the width of the fence (the barbed wire, the ditch and the fence) in
the Gilboa reserve would only be 35 meters and not 80, as it is in
the Tulkarm and Kalkilya area. Israel appears to care more about
flowers and antiquities than people.
The original plan called
for a complex system of gates: five controlled crossings similar to
the Erez crossing, and another around 30 "farming" gates
through which fallahin who have land west of the fence could cross.
The Civil Administration was to provide permits for those with land
beyond the barrier and to allow medical teams or teachers cross the
barrier. It was on the basis of these promises that the High Court of
Justice denied the petitions of the Palestinians against the
fence.
The security establishment now admits that there is no
chance that the terminals meant to channel civilians and goods will
be ready by July, at which time the first section of the fence will
be completed and become operational. "There are seven control
points for Jews and nine for Arabs, and they will be operated the
moment the fence is operated," the army says officially.
The
matter of the crossings also tends to become blurred. In reply to a
query in the Knesset, Defense Minister Mofaz said: "At this time
there is no budget for farming crossings." The Palestinians say,
for example, that in the section already paved between Kafin and
Shweika, which according to the map is to have eight farming
crossings, there is not even one. And even if there were, it is
unclear who can cross and when. All attempts by the attorneys of the
Palestinian landowners and of B'Tselem to receive clarifications were
rejected with the reply that "the matter is being examined."
Even to the question as to what time the farming crossing would open
(the fallahin go to work at 4:00 in the morning), and would it be
open all year, there was no reply.
Contrary to Palestinian
claims, army officials say that the farmers' gates are part of the
fence, and they are all ready. "The question is when and how
they will open, but that's not our affair, that is a matter for the
Civil Administration." Abu Mazen raised the issue in his first
meeting with Sharon and Sharon himself promised, the newspapers
reported, that nobody would block the farmers from getting to their
lands. "You should realize that I am a fallah. I know what
attachment to the land is, and that is why I ordered that many gates
be opened in the fence to let the farmers work their land. The fence
is not a border," Roni Shaked quoted Sharon in Yedioth Ahronoth.
However, as said, there is still no clear procedure in the Civil
Administration to arrange the crossing. The Civil Administration
refused to comment.
IDF officials say that the farmers will be
allowed to cross to their land with no problem, "after they
prove they have rights to the land." Army officials say there is
a plan to define clearly who exactly has the right to cross the
fence, "but it is still too early to make this public." In
any case, if it turns out that a Palestinian who has to cross the
fence for farming or other matters has a "security past,"
his chances of reaching his destination are nil. "You don't
build a fence at an investment of millions to be like Swiss cheese,
where every senior Hamas wanted man can cross because they have land
beyond the fence," army officials say. Mashiah sounds even more
adamant: "Even if the fallah's son has a security past, he won't
cross. The fallah should take this into account. And if even one
terror attack manages to get through a farming gate, this crossing
will turn into a wall. Nobody will cross."
Mashiah
promises to hand over the first section of the completed fence this
July. At this time the plan is being drawn up for the rest of the
fence. This has been totally changed. Before Ben-Eliezer left the
Defense Ministry, the ministry had drawn up a plan for the rest of
the fence. "There was a general order to continue the route,"
says Ben-Eliezer, "as close as possible to the Green Line."
Security sources involved in the fence's construction confirm that
this was the order, and that the first maps were drawn
accordingly.
These plans were thrown in the trash. "I
fought against this plan from the start," says Ron Nahman, mayor
of Ariel. "Fuad and the Labor Party wanted to abandon us, to
leave 50,000 Jews outside the fence." Nahman met with security
establishment leaders, and proved to them with numbers that in his
area there are more Jews than Arabs, but nothing helped. That is
until the second Sharon government came to power. In early May Mofaz
told him festively that it was decided for good that Ariel would be
inside the fence. Along with Ariel, the settlements of Elkana, Maale
Shomron, Karnei Shomron, Kedumim, Emanuel, Pduel and Alei Zahav would
be included. The last two settlements are ten kilometers away from
the Green Line.
Pinhas Wallerstein, head of the Binyamin
Regional Council, says that in the last few days he has been meeting
with army commanders in the area over the maps and trying to persuade
them to also include what is known as "the Talmonim bloc"
(five Jewish settlements northwest of Ramallah, about 20 kilometers
from the Green Line) into a "balloon," as was done around
Alfei Menashe. If this plan is realized ("I won't say I have
their consent already," says Wallerstein), this would mean that
the separation fence would look like a string of Norwegian fjords.
And the difficulties the Palestinian residents have along the section
now being completed would be child's play in comparison.
These
plans outrage Fuad. "I very much hope this doesn't happen,"
he says. "It is both expensive and it complicates the pursuit of
terrorists and will make it difficult to maneuver troops."
Military officials involved in planning the fence share Fuad's
opinion. For the fence to be effective, they say, it has to be as
short and as straight as possible. What is happening is exactly the
opposite.
Military sources involved in the fence say that the
security establishment has basically completed drawing the route of
the fence from Elkana to Camp Ofer - exactly 210.5 kilometers. "Now
we are only waiting for the budget and we're off." And the
matter of the budget is no minor matter. Originally, when Ben-Eliezer
was defense minister, this section was to be 100 kilometers. "Another
110 kilometers were added, because it was decided that the fence
would also surround Israeli settlements in the West Bank," say
military sources.
A simple calculation shows that this
addition will cost the taxpayer around NIS 1.3 billion. And this is a
moderate estimate. "South of Elkana the region is more
difficult. It could cost more," say army sources. "It would
be cheaper to give each resident of Kedumim a villa in the center of
Israel than to build this fence." The delay in building the
fence is also liable to be long. The new route is complicated and
goes through mountains and is also liable to raise tough legal
problems, army sources say. The Finance Ministry also doesn't know
where precisely it will get such sums.
None of this interests
Ron Nahman. "I reject all of Fuad's statements and his bunch,"
he says. "Who are these army people? What do they understand
that I don't understand, they have nothing to teach me. Nu, so what's
the big deal if the fence is lengthened another 60 kilometers. Aren't
50,000 Jews worth it?"
In the opinion of the Defense
Ministry, the settlers in Samaria are worth it, and how. At precisely
this time, the region is being mapped from the air, and around ten
planning offices are working on preparing the maps. The Prime
Minister's Office said that discussions on the fence route from
Elkana to Jerusalem "are taking place at this time, and the
government's decision will be made at the time set," but in an
interview to The Jerusalem Post last week, Sharon left no room for
doubt. Ariel and Emanuel will be west of the fence, he said. These
additions very much lengthen the fence. The original plan was for 350
kilometers of fence. Now the fence is 650 kilometers, in other words,
another NIS 4.5 billion. And this is without counting the fence along
the mountaintop.
A look at the map leads to a simple
conclusion - the separation fence being built at this time basically
overlaps the Sharon map for a Palestinian state. A bit more than 40%
of the West Bank, split and sliced into pieces. The northern West
Bank is cut off from the southern West Bank and to go from Bethlehem
to Ramallah a Palestinian will have to cross two border
crossings.
The system of internal fences, "open prisons"
the Palestinians call them, will be even more sophisticated in the
new section. For example, the fence is meant to go on the eastern
side of road 446 and leave the settlements of Ofarim, Beit Aryeh and
Nili on the Israeli side. In the middle there will be about ten large
Arab villages such as Kibiya and Rantis imprisoned behind another
fence in the shape of a loop. These ten villages will have only one
exit to the east, to Ramallah, through a control point in the "main"
fence. A similar loop, with another internal fence, will be extended
south of road 443, the Modiin-Jerusalem road, and will also include
about ten villages. Jamal Juma of the Palestinian Environment
Association says that around 50,000 people live in these enclaves
alone.
"It would not be an illusion to speak of cantons,"
says Uzi Dayan. Dayan thinks that all this preoccupation with
extending the fence is in fact meant to delay its construction
because Sharon and Mofaz don't want a fence. Perhaps there is
something to this. Army officials say that building the new section,
from Elkana to Ramallah, will take a year and a half to two years,
because it is winding and more complicated than the first section,
whose construction took exactly a year. Only afterwards will
construction on the fence in Judea begin. "The fence could have
been finished a long time ago," says Dayan, "Sharon and
Mofaz are not working on the fence. That's it. Everything else is
immaterial. They are trying not to do it. I don't believe there is a
master plan. If there was, the fence would have been up."
He
could be right. But he could very well be wrong. Sharon is known for
his affection for creating facts on the ground. According to the
Palestinians' calculations, almost 400,000 Palestinians (around 20%
of West Bank residents) including residents of the neighborhoods and
villages around Jerusalem will be on the "Israeli" side of
the fence. The 80% on the Palestinian side of the fence will also
find it very hard to move from place to place without Israeli
permission.
The road map talks about a Palestinian state by
the year 2005 in "viable" borders. It's hard to see how
anyone can live within such borders. And perhaps that is precisely
Sharon's plan. Just like he initiated the settlements to mark the
future borders of Israel, now he is marking them by means of the
fence. And it will be very hard to move this fence.
"You
leave us no room to grow, you leave us no room to live," says
Jamal Juma. The only thing left the Palestinians is to live in huge
pens and to work in industrial zones that will no doubt be built in
the settlements, near the openings to these pens. "You want us
to live like slaves. It won't work. If you had built the fence along
the Green Line, there would be no problem. This way perhaps you'll
have quiet for four-five years, but you will create only hatred.
Instead of 20% Hamas, you'll have 60%."
This
article was first published in Hebrew in the Israeli newspaper
Yedioth Ahronoth, on 23 May 2003 under the title "A
Wall in the Heart". Translation by Israel News Today.